"What do you mean 'Good Samaritan'?"
In my last blog, I rewrote the parable of the Good Samaritan. I want to talk a little more about that today.
We often tell this story, but rarely focus much on the context. The parable was in response to a lawyers question. He asked Christ what he had to do to go to Heaven. Jesus answered his question with another question- "What does it say in the Law? What's your take on it?" The lawyer answers with the same answer Christ gives the lawyer in Matthew 22, to love God and love your neighbor as yourself.
Here's where things get interesting. Christ tells the man "Do this and you will live." But this lawyer wants to justify himself, so asks "Who is my neighbor?" Basically "Who do I really have to love?" Christ's answer is the story of the Good Samaritan.
Its a little ironic that we even call the story "The Good Samaritan," because in Christ's day, the average Jew would probably see that as an oxymoron. There was nothing good about Samaritans. They got their name from the city of Samaria, which was the capital of the Northern Kingdom, Israel. When Israel was taken over by Assyria, the Israelites mixed with Gentiles (non-Jews). So these Samaritans were half-breeds, partially Jewish, but also disgustingly part Gentile, and that made them social outcasts. They were not allowed into the temple for regular worship. They were socially unclean and thus made outcasts.
I find it very interesting that Jesus' story didn't come out and say "You should love the Samaritans" or even a more general plea to love the outcast. Instead, He chose to shame the socially elite religious people. Priests and Levites held a lot of respect for leading the worship at the temple, but in Christ's story, they are the bad examples, not showing love to their neighbor and disobeying the law. Instead, the outcast Samaritan is showing extraordinary love to a stranger.
And all this in response to the lawyer's question "What must I do to inherit eternal life?" Is Jesus really saying these good religious people are not going to inherit eternity? Was He possibly alluding that this Samaritan, who was not accepted by the religious, would be accepted by Father God and given a place in Heaven? Sounds pretty radical to me. What do you think?
We often tell this story, but rarely focus much on the context. The parable was in response to a lawyers question. He asked Christ what he had to do to go to Heaven. Jesus answered his question with another question- "What does it say in the Law? What's your take on it?" The lawyer answers with the same answer Christ gives the lawyer in Matthew 22, to love God and love your neighbor as yourself.
Here's where things get interesting. Christ tells the man "Do this and you will live." But this lawyer wants to justify himself, so asks "Who is my neighbor?" Basically "Who do I really have to love?" Christ's answer is the story of the Good Samaritan.
Its a little ironic that we even call the story "The Good Samaritan," because in Christ's day, the average Jew would probably see that as an oxymoron. There was nothing good about Samaritans. They got their name from the city of Samaria, which was the capital of the Northern Kingdom, Israel. When Israel was taken over by Assyria, the Israelites mixed with Gentiles (non-Jews). So these Samaritans were half-breeds, partially Jewish, but also disgustingly part Gentile, and that made them social outcasts. They were not allowed into the temple for regular worship. They were socially unclean and thus made outcasts.
I find it very interesting that Jesus' story didn't come out and say "You should love the Samaritans" or even a more general plea to love the outcast. Instead, He chose to shame the socially elite religious people. Priests and Levites held a lot of respect for leading the worship at the temple, but in Christ's story, they are the bad examples, not showing love to their neighbor and disobeying the law. Instead, the outcast Samaritan is showing extraordinary love to a stranger.
And all this in response to the lawyer's question "What must I do to inherit eternal life?" Is Jesus really saying these good religious people are not going to inherit eternity? Was He possibly alluding that this Samaritan, who was not accepted by the religious, would be accepted by Father God and given a place in Heaven? Sounds pretty radical to me. What do you think?
5 Comments:
I like the thoughts...
But that was a cheap shot at me! Camp Ponderosa is just as good as precious Camp Arnold.
HAPPY BIRTHDAY!!!!!!!!
Love MJ and Robyn!
Ps... prepare for birthday beats when you get back!! RAWR!
Interesting. You're right - a very counter-culutral statement for first century Palestine!
What implications do you think this has for Muslims, Hindus, Sikhs, Buddists....
There is a teaching by a Muslim Cleric that states he hopes that 1/3 of all people in heaven are Muslim (quite ironically, 1/3 of the world population at the time was Muslim...)
... just a thought...
(from Aurora's controversial cousin...)
Very nice site! Health plan medical advisory committees fico calculations student multitrip travel insurance tour long stay travel insurance kyrgyzstan Marriott time share aruba http://www.swings-chairs.info/Butalbital-c-o-d-usa.html Nitto 555 tires mercedes s600 insurance for a vacation individual adderall prices
You have an outstanding good and well structured site. I enjoyed browsing through it »
Post a Comment
<< Home